SUCCESS METRICS

Baltimore City

2021-2022 SCHOOL YEAR

BMORE METRICS: Headliner

GOAL 1

Increase STEM literacy, curiosity, and identity in youth from historically under-resourced communities.

GOAL 2

Increase the capacity of schools and community organizations to implement high-quality, informal STEM learning experiences in historically under-resourced communities.

BMORE METRICS: Infographics

GOAL 1

Increase STEM literacy, curiosity, and identity in youth from historically under-
resourced communities.

BMORE METRICS: Text

How much did we do?

BMORE METRICS: Text

140

Number of Activities and Events

1690

Number of Youth Served

924

Unique youth served

5

Number of youth organizations LETS GO partnered with to deliver services

22

Number of program sites

BMORE METRICS: Schedule

How well did we do it?

BMORE METRICS: Text

18%

Average % growth in STEM knowledge indicated by content assessments

263

Number of students indicating STEM knowledge mastery in content assessments

45%

% students showing mastery of STEM knowledge

83%

% partners VERY satisfied with LETS GO planning and execution

BMORE METRICS: Schedule

Is anyone better off?

BMORE METRICS: Text

81%

% of students who report positive change for STEM engagement

64%

% of students who report positive change for STEM identity (4th grade and above)

65%

% of students who report positive change for STEM curiosity (4th grade and above)

81%

% of students who report positive change for STEM career interest (6th grade and above)

BMORE METRICS: Schedule

GOAL 2

Increase the capacity of schools and community organizations to implement high-quality, informal STEM learning experiences in historically under-resourced communities.

BMORE METRICS: Text

How much did we do?

BMORE METRICS: Text

52

Number of STEM instructor training workshops for partner staff/instructors

211

Number of STEM instructor training workshop participants/headcount

105

Number of unique STEM instructor training workshop participants

BMORE METRICS: Schedule

How well did we do it?

BMORE METRICS: Text

92%

% instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that training content was useful and relevant (Workshop Training Evaluation)

92%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that the training met their expectations (Workshop Training Evaluation)

92%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that the training met their expectations (Workshop Training Evaluation)

92%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they knew they could reach out to LETS GO for support as they brought STEM to their classrooms (Workshop Training Evaluation)

BMORE METRICS: Schedule

Is anyone better off?

BMORE METRICS: Text

81%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they were competent to teach students about the Engineering Design process and/or the Scientific Method (Workshop Training Evaluation)

75%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they could deliver the STEM content taught in the training (Workshop Training Evaluation)

77%

% of instructors trained STRONGLY agreed that they were able to engage students in STEM practices (Workshop Training Evaluation)

BMORE METRICS: Schedule